Overview

  • Founded Date November 30, 1990
  • Sectors مبيعات
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 3

Company Description

This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system business that establishes open-source large language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design offers actions similar to other modern large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were developed in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to restrict the ability of these 2 countries to develop sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its very first free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share price to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against bigger and more recognized competitors has been referred to as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the very first shot at what is emerging as a worldwide AI area race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, enabling its code to be easily readily available for usage, modification, watching, and designing files for building purposes. [13] The business reportedly intensely recruits young AI scientists from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer technology field to diversify its models’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading since the 2007-2008 financial crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on developing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily readily available for usage, modification, and watching. This consists of approval to access and utilize the source code, in addition to style documents, for constructing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic basic intelligence laboratory devoted to research developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s financial service. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital companies hesitated in offering financing as it was not likely that it would have the ability to create an exit in a brief amount of time. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being called the driver for China’s AI model rate war. It was quickly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the rate of their AI models to take on the business. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research and has no comprehensive plans for commercialization; [20] this also allows its technology to avoid the most strict arrangements of China’s AI regulations, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to abide by the government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s working with preferences target technical abilities rather than work experience, leading to the majority of brand-new hires being either current university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires people without any computer science background to help its innovation comprehend other subjects and understanding locations, consisting of being able to create poetry and perform well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions tests (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available for free to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and responsible downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was launched). It was developed to take on other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than most open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the exact same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base designs was likewise released concurrently, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the exact same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed comparable performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are constantly queried, and “routed professionals” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with expert balancing. In basic MoE, some specialists can become excessively relied on, while other specialists might be hardly ever used, squandering specifications. Attempting to balance the professionals so that they are similarly utilized then triggers specialists to duplicate the same capacity. They proposed the shared experts to discover core capabilities that are frequently utilized, and let the routed professionals to find out the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step solutions. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit model was a procedure benefit design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This benefit model was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was continually upgraded during training to prevent benefit hacking. This led to the RL design.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 stages. The very first stage was trained to resolve math and coding problems. This phase used 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd stage was trained to be handy, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase utilized 3 benefit designs. The helpfulness and security benefit designs were trained on human preference information. The rule-based benefit model was by hand programmed. All qualified benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on reasoning data had “special characteristics” various from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on thinking might improve over more training actions. [31]

The two V2-Lite models were smaller, and experienced likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were substantially modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of specialists (MoE) alternative formerly released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics problems was computed by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was created by a reward design trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the exact same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It consisted of a greater ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (mathematics, programming, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, basic concern answering) data. Reasoning data was created by “skilled designs”. Non-reasoning data was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by people. – The “professional designs” were trained by starting with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial information produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to show and validate throughout thinking. Then the specialist designs were RL utilizing an undefined reward function.
– Each professional model was trained to produce simply artificial reasoning information in one particular domain (mathematics, programs, reasoning).
– Expert models were utilized, instead of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad format, and excessive length”.

4. Model-based reward models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data containing both last benefit and chain-of-thought causing the final benefit. The benefit design produced reward signals for both questions with objective but free-form answers, and questions without unbiased responses (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward models and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was calculated for math issues with a last answer (put in a box), and for shows problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed extensive low-level engineering to accomplish effectiveness. They utilized mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, needing unique GEMM routines to accumulate accurately. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They lowered communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific maker each professional was on in order to avoid specific machines being queried more frequently than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing methods. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available through DeepSeek’s API, as well as via a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for rational reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it utilized 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, but rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data generated by R1. [47]

A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant initially thinks of the thinking process in the mind and then offers the user with the response. The reasoning procedure and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here answer here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “primarily” of 2 types (other types were not defined): accuracy rewards and format rewards. Accuracy reward was examining whether a boxed response is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format benefit was checking whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has issues with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to resolve these concerns and more enhance reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL process as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency reward” to motivate it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated reasoning had an incorrect last answer, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial information for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for reasoning tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly answers questions, fixes reasoning problems and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes considerably less resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta spent constructing its most current AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly minimal expense has been acknowledged as potentially challenging the worldwide supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 design was supposedly “on par with” one of OpenAI’s most current designs when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with experts and asked him to supply opinions and tips on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has actually highlighted possible limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which consist of export restrictions on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs subsequently “stimulated market chaos” [57] and caused shares in major international technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had actually led to record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of worth was wiped off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended responses to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are included in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “super excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed uncertainty of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interfered with the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the official application programming interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, uses censorship systems for subjects that are thought about politically delicate for the government of China. For instance, the model refuses to respond to concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first produce an answer, however then erases it shortly afterwards and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship mechanisms and restrictions can only be removed to a minimal extent in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We firmly oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are devoted to accomplishing the complete reunification of the motherland through peaceful means.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to deceive DeepSeek into offering specific responses to some of these subjects by asking for in its answer to switch certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy

Some experts fear that the federal government of China might use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, surveillance and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy conditions say “We save the information we gather in safe and secure servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our design and Services”. Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security issues. [80] In reaction, the Italian data protection authority is seeking extra information on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal data, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually started a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government banned the usage of DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s usage of individual information. [83]

Artificial intelligence market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed picking “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user might use it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s inexpensive, open AI design DeepSeek thrills scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive models and weaker chips call into concern trillions in AI facilities spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you must understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to plunge?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI model outperforms Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design seems among the finest ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first reasoning design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs by means of Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek overtakes ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek poses a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI design advancement highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “super impressive”: “We must take the advancements out of China really, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘impressive'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends huge Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily restricted new sign-ups, mentioning ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We attempted out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI positions formidable cyber, data personal privacy threats”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator looks for details from DeepSeek on information protection”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines effect of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.